
Heat wave in Wisconsin. Today was almost fifty degrees. Which means that it's warm enough to think. Which means more crackpot theories in this blog than usual, more bombast, more interpretation, pronounced with a phony French accent.
We finally see Hamlet (they guy, not the play) in Scene Two, after a long speech by Hamlet's uncle/stepfather/king Claudius. Claudius' speech is effective. He addresses Old Hamlet's death (and implicitly his succession), his marriage, a coming threat to the kingdom, and he passes out favors to his supporters (he lets Laertes, son of his chief adviser Polonius, go back to France). Then, he turns to Hamlet and asks him to stop being sad.
Addressing Hamlet in front of other people is probably a mistake by Claudius. Hamlet's first three lines are one-liner puns that eviscerate the formal stateliness of Claudius and Gertrude. We get two things from these first lines from Hamlet. First, Claudius is no match for him, at least when it comes to thinking and speaking. Second, Hamlet is intent on turning things on their head.
This is helpful in understanding what's going on with Hamlet. We have a right to ask: what is the root of Hamlet's sadness? Okay, his dad's been dead for about a month. That sucks. And his mom married his uncle. He's definitely upset about that. And he's been denied the throne, even though he's the late king's only son. So, I'm sure he's upset about each of these things. But, these opening lines, wherein he keeps turning people's words around, where everything he says has a double or triple meaning, suggest to me that it's a little bit broader.
I don't know. Geez, it's not like I can figure out Hamlet. But, it seems to me like he's realized that the world does not work well. The way the world, or at least the world of Elsinore, is set up is faulty. Claudius and Gertrude urge him to think of how common it is to lose a father, but this is stating a part of the problem, not alleviating the problem. Nature is poor. I may be transposing my own fixations onto Hamlet (and really, who doesn't?), but I think it's a kind of theodicy problem. At the beginning of Olivier's film, the narrator says "This is the tragedy of a man who could not make up his mind." Olivier does violence to the play throughout his movie (he called it "an essay on Hamlet"), and nowhere more so than here. It's not a tragedy of a man who could not make up his mind. It's the tragedy of a man who has realized that his mind does not fit in the world he lives in. The time is out of joint, oh cursed spite, that ever I was born to make it right. Before we even hear from him, we hear from Claudius that Hamlet wants out of Elsinore. He wants to go back to college at Wittenberg, but is denied permission, unlike Laertes.
It's popular to say that Hamlet is too big for his play (popular among people who wear black clothes and berets, smoke bidi's, and are twelve credit hours away from using perfect grammar while taking your order at McDonald's, or asking if you'd like a bag at the used bookstore). This is true, but he's also too big and too good for this poorly constructed world, like so many people I know, including several of you. Some of you, however, well... Just kidding.
Also, I just saw a commercial for Long John Silver's promoting their new "London-style" fish and fries. First, I always thought that the revolution was in part so that we could have church-basement style fried fish, instead of London-style. Second, I imagine that when the queen hears this, she will dig herself a grave, just so that she can roll over in it.